The final TAP submission should be a noticeably revised update of Parts I-VI of the Threat Assessment Plan submitted in Topics 1-6 (attached with revi...

criminal justice report and need an explanation and answer to help me learn. The final TAP submission should be a noticeably revised update of Parts I-VI of the Threat Assessment Plan submitted in Topics 1-6 (attached with revisions made) incorporating instructor comments, peer-review feedback, and personal revising. Submit the TAP as one document. Responses need to reflect the terminology of the industry. Be sure to cite all of your sources from your original research and any subsequent research from your revisions for the Topics 1-6 assignments. You should cite at least 18 sources total in the presentation (unless some sources have been cited in multiple assignments). ****To clarify this weeks assignment. You are to take all your tap assignments from 1-6 inckuding the powerpoint presentation (all attached). Make recommended revisions. Then add them all to one document, separating each tap assignment by subsection and then adding all of your tap sources at the bottom. Requirements: Combining all TAP assignments JUS-470 Topic 1 TAP Part I: Overview of Assessment and Analysis Instructions: Access the information on the environment that you will be using to create your threat assessment plan, and then address the following questions. Each question need to be answered by using the terminology of the industry. Please note the word-count for each of the questions that follow. Be sure to cite three to five relevant scholarly sources in support of your content. Use only sources found at the GCU Library, government websites or those provided in Class Resources. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance. Benchmark Information This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies: Bachelor of Science in Justice Studies 4.3: Assess strategies and guidelines for using technology in case management and administration. Explain The Advantages Of Having A Threat Assessment Plan. (100-200 Words) A threat valuation strategy is crucial to every institute since it has several benefits. A threat assessment plan protects organizations against losses. It identifies and understands potential risks hence limiting liabilities. It also identifies exposure by determining weaknesses in the security system (Ennis et al., 2015). Consequently, the plan designs necessary actions to minimize or eliminate the threatening events. Notably, it assesses and remediates threat areas. The assessment plan also determines the necessity of new security requirements. Understanding the security vulnerabilities in an organization determines the required steps to eliminate or manage these weaknesses and improve the organization's security. It also improves the planning of an organization in making smart purchases. The information a threat assessment plan provides aids in appropriate budgeting. After an organization identifies its weaknesses through the plan, it can avoid potential overspending on a problem that does not need an expensive solution. Furthermore, a threat assessment plan improves decision-making. The comprehensive information enables members of an organization to understand the significant security threats and what should be done to counter such problems. It also boosts IT employees' productivity as they can better understand their systems. It helps them plan for future changes. Explain The Core Elements Of A Threat Assessment Plan (150-250 Words) A threat valuation plan's core features include managing, managing, and assessing threats (Miller, 2014). Identifying the Threat People need to know when, when, and how to report threat concerns for the established order to identify threats easily. For instance, Miller (2014) underlines that in Washington, D.C., an intercom announcement encourages commuters to "say something if they see something." It is also vital for the established order to express that the tips received will be sensibly and with judgment handled. Sometimes, people get reluctant to report for fear of entangling themselves in trouble or wrongly implicating someone (Meloy, 2015). Assessing the Threat After identifying the threats, you must assess them after evaluating information from several sources (Vossekuil et al., 2015). The hazard conditions will come in easy reach in carrying out a risk valuation. The threat matrix or odds surrounding substance uses the factors of the chance of a threat occurring and its possible waves. The possibility might be standard, truncated, extraordinary, or acute. To assess the likelihood of a threat, one can use history and location to evaluate its probability of occurring. Managing the Threat Lastly, assess the reactions you have put in domicile and the procedure. Make certain whether you did appropriate documentation and valuation of the threats. Consequently, Set up controls. Some controls consist of creating policies, documenting emergency response plans, and training employees. Also, see the efficiency of the reins: and how firm you can react to a threat. Look at the obtainable means to discourse the threats. Recap the procedure as you fit in any new data. Discuss The Use Of Technology In Threat Assessment In 600-750 Words, By Addressing The Following: Identify The Types Of Technology That Is Being Used For Threat Assessment By Local, State, And Federal LE Agencies. Threat assessment requires the use of machineries to oversee its operations successfully. Technology can be hard or soft (Bryne & Marx, 2017). Firm technology is the hardware part of technology, while soft technology consists of software used in threat valuation. The hard technology consists of Mobile data centers, Metal detectors, Video in patrol cars, Computers in squad cars, Citizen Protection devices, CCTV, Street lighting, and Ignition interlocks. Soft technology includes Risk assessment tools, Threat assessment tools, Creating watch lists, Amber alerts, and Crime mapping. Identify The Technologies Being Used By The Emergency Management And Private Threat Protection Fields. Additionally, the technologies or rather machineries utilized here include the use of drones. Drones can be used in places where human beings cannot reach them. The drones assist in surveillance. Moreover, they do not need anyone’s presence within them to operate. They are controlled from afar. They can also work underwater and in the air. Another technology used is mobile phones. These gadgets provide several services that provide huge aid in emergency management (Byrne & Marx, 2017). The services they provide include the internet, cameras, and text messages. They can also provide location-based services. These services can help significantly during crisis or emergency management. The internet through its social display place, voice calls, and text messages help the family members, public, and friends keep in trace. Big data technology is also used for emergency management. Its capability to process more information than a number of modes like drones and phones in the course of a disaster aids significantly. The information eases the generation of appropriate reactions to catastrophes. Further, the Internet of Things (IoT) is also essential in emergency management. This real-time technology passes on data on a disaster's likely happenings through measuring device. The report helps during inadequate preparations. Another technology used is Artificial Intelligence (AI). Some set of rules may make PCs try to be like human beings, therefore artificial intellect. Artificial Intellect assists in identifying calamities like earthquakes. Timely detection of such disasters helps hasten response and avoid possible significant losses. Robots can also be used in emergency management. Robots have measuring device and computer chip that allow them to liberate missions in dwellings where human beings would not have been able to, bearing in mind the prospective risks involved (Byrne & Marx, 2017). Social media podiums such as Twitter and Facebook also equip users with features that hasty them to streak themselves not dangerous if there is an emergency. The report saves the organization team from accounting for individuals in the tragedy zone. Give Examples Of The Technologies And How The Technology Is Used In Threat Management. There are various technologies utilized in managing menace. Among them is user behavior analytics. This technology helps in identifying unauthorized access. If a person acquires unapproved access to a password or username, actions analytics can sense when the individual starts carrying out mischievous actions and raise a red flag. By raising the red flag, the system administrators can block those activities (Byrne & Marx, 2017). Another technology is hardware authentication. This technology covers the inadequacies of usernames and passwords. Data loss prevention also manages threats in an organization. Encryption and tokenization can inhibit data loss by computer-generated attackers. Supplementary, Cloud keeps information safe by inhibiting impostors who may want to snip or alter it. Assess The Viability Or Effectiveness Of The Various Technologies Used By These Threat Management Fields. The most important risk plans, including the less expensive and non-complex tools, can help in trailing risks and reporting them. Such devices consist of MS Office and others. Social media firms use social media podiums to trail customer replies and opinion to take fast act should they be worried (Byrne & Marx, 2017). Also, integration and information analytics enable firms to set hazard information points in their enormous databases to become aware of any threat to information and unauthorized access. Information Drawing out can also assists identify if a machine flops or scheme is about to take place. References Vossekuil, B., Fein, R. A., & Berglund, J. M. (2015). Threat assessment: Assessing the risk of targeted violence. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 2(3-4), 243. Meloy, J. R., Mohandie, K., Knoll, J. L., & Hoffmann, J. (2015). The concept of identification in threat assessment. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 33(2-3), 213-237. Byrne, J., & Marx, G. (2017). Technological innovations in crime prevention and policing. A review of the research on implementation and impact. Journal of Police Studies, 20(3), 17–40. Ennis, L., Hargreaves, T., & Gulayets, M. (2015). The Integrated Threat and Risk Assessment Centre: A PROGRAM evaluation investigating the implementation of threat management recommendations. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 2(2), 114–126. Miller, A. (2014, February). Threat assessment in action. Monitor on Psychology. Retrieved from . JUS-470 Topic 2 Assessment of Assets Matrix Instructions: Complete Part I and II below. Remember that you are assessing assets in the environment being used for the TAP. Use industry terminology. Be sure to cite three to five relevant scholarly sources in support of your content. Use only sources found at the GCU Library, government websites or those provided in Class Resources. This assignment uses a scoring guide. Please review the scoring guide prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance. Part I: Brainstorming list of Assets Instructions: For the first part of this assignment, brainstorm to determine all of the assets in the chosen environment. Be sure to include all “types’ of assets, e.g., “things” as well as information assets, “people” assets, and moving assets. That list will be used to help complete the Matrix in Part II (the list below is a starting point; there may be more or less assets in your specific environment). 1. Technologies like communication networks 2. Information. E.g., proprietary, trademarks and copyrights, patents, and employees' and customers’ personal information. 3. Systems like alarms, management information systems (MIS), Decision Support Systems (DSS) and Transaction Processing Systems. (TPS) 4. Facilities like business premises. 5. Equipment such as industrial computers and automobiles (through tracking) 6. Processes like automated manufacturing and supply chains. 7. IT infrastructures like company computers, tablets, and other portable computers (PCs) 8. Software such as Microsoft word and antiviruses 9. Social networks like the company's website. 10. People, including contractors, employees, and vendors. Part II: Evaluation of Assets Instructions: Complete the matrix below regarding evaluating assets in your environment. Please note the instructions for each section of the matrix. Additionally, you can add to this matrix if more space is needed. Be sure to include all “types” of assets, e.g., “things” as well as information assets, “people” assets, and moving assets. Use your brainstorming list to help with this. Catalog and audit your assets, e.g., How many groups of people, buildings, etc., do you have in the environment? Rank the value of assets Who and/or what is the most vulnerable to be attacked? Give your rationale. References Borum, R. (2015). Assessing risk for terrorism involvement. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 2(2): 63-87. Retrieved from https://journals.scholarsportal.info/details/21694842/v02i0002/63_arfti.xml Webster, D. C., Bloom, H. & Eisen, S. R. (2008). Towards the scientific and professional assessment of violence potential in the workplace. Journal of Threat Assessment, 2(4). Shafieezadeh, A., Cha, J. E. & Ellingwood, R. B. (2015). A decision framework for managing risk to airports from terrorist attacks. Risk Analysis, Vol. 35, No. 2, 2015 Ayyub, M. B., McGill, L. W. & Kaminskiy, M. (2007). Critical asset and portfolio risk analysis: An all-hazard framework. Risk Analysis, Vol. 27, No. 4, 2007 JUS-470 Topic 3 TAP Part III: Assessment of Threats Instructions: This assignment will address prior and possible current threats to the assets in the environment (used in this project). NOTE: If you conduct research on your environment and are unable to find any history of actual previous threats then project the types of threats that could have existed previously in your chosen environment. Be sure to adhere to the word count for each question. Each question need to be answered by using the terminology of the industry. Be sure to cite three to five relevant scholarly sources in support of your content. Use only sources found at the GCU Library, government websites or those provided in Class Resources. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance. Conduct qualitative research to assess prior threats. How were the threats carried out in your environment? For example, how the shooting at Columbine was carried out. (250-350 words) Conducting a threat assessment is a crucial examination that may be performed in every given setting. When assessing a danger, numerous factors must be considered together, including the likelihood of the threat occurring, its severity, and the potential impact it could have (Temkinet al., 2020). Identifying the threat, classifying it, evaluating its overall severity, and creating a plan to eliminate it are all key steps in any threat assessment. In an ideal world, terrorists are mostly to blame for the majority of environmental dangers. And importantly, terrorists employ a wide variety of methods and strategies in order to carry out their threats (Temkin et al., 2020). Ultimately, the level of intricacy or simplicity of a terrorist's chosen approach will depend on the type of attack he or she intends to conduct. These terrorists may employ suicide attacks, kidnappings, mass shootings, and bombings primarily. Terrorists employ certain tactics to instill dread in the hearts of authorities and the bodies of their victims. A school shooting similar to the one in Columbia is exemplary. Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris were responsible for the Columbine High School shooting (Temkin et al., 2020). Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris staged the attack using propane bombs, and they carried it out. They had put the bombs in the cafeteria with the intent of detonating them during lunch. Students used guys to simultaneously shoot other students and faculty personnel. They executed their plan, resulting in the deaths of at least 12 students and one teacher. The incident caused additional injuries, some of which were life-threatening. Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris ultimately turned their firearms on themselves after killing as many people as they could (Temkin et al., 2020). The propane bombs placed in the cafeteria did not detonate, but everything else went as planned. The suicidal ideation that drove Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris to conduct the atrocities they did was crucial to their decision-making processes. Determine possible threats to specific assets in the (your) environment. (100-150 words) Analyze the modus operandi of past threats on assets in your specific environment. Break down and outline the MO. Was it spontaneous, or was it planned? Delineate how the individual or group carried out the threat. (250-300 words) Identify a threat on an asset that is new to your environment. For example, if a politician comes in the building, how do we assess the threat of assassination? What is the connection between threats? (such as assassination, throwing a shoe, verbal assault, or kidnaping.)- (150-200 words) References JUS-470 Topic 4 Evaluation of Protective Resources Instructions: Research a case study on the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing and address the following questions regarding the protection of assets. Your response to each question should be within the listed word count parameters, and you will need to cite in-text and list your references at the end of the worksheet. You may use bullet points when a list is necessary. Each question need to be answered by using the terminology of the industry. Be sure to cite three to five relevant scholarly sources in support of your content. Use only sources found at the GCU Library, government websites or those provided in Class Resources. This assignment uses a scoring guide. Please review the scoring guide prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance. In general, describe the types of technology that have been used in the past and what is currently being used to protect assets from various threats. (150-200 words) Several different technologies have been and are now being deployed to keep valuables safe from harm. In the past, the information would only be discussed among the members of a limited network that was contained within a single commercial structure. Within the limited network, the company needed to safeguard their system against access by unapproved users or authentications so that it could maintain the confidentiality of its data (Ennis et al., 2015). This workable but limited information security needed to be upgraded to a link that could operate on a significantly more comprehensive scale, one that was not limited to the confines of the tiny business building but networks that extended throughout the globe. The internet is one example of this network and features a worldwide connection. Current surveillance cameras aid in arresting and prosecuting criminals who threaten valuables' safety. Using bomb-sniffing dogs to detect bombs is a neat application of cutting-edge technology aimed at making communities safer.  What technologies were being used to protect the assets when the attack in OKC took place? (150-200 words) There were already several safety precautions in place when the bombing in Oklahoma City took place. The main architect for the General Services Administration committed to putting in place the maximum protections available at the time. What happened was well-planned and designed, but he swore it would not happen again. The security officers at the entrance of the building investigated the truck. However, they mistook it for a truck carrying fertilizer when, in reality, it was a bomb that had been modified. Thanks to the surveillance systems that were in place, a suspect was captured on tape entering the building with a truck that was filled with fertilizer, diesel gasoline, and other chemicals. After entering the building, he departed in a getaway car. Records were kept of vehicles coming into and going out of the facility, together with the names and identification numbers of the people operating the vehicles. This was done so that everyone in the building could be located and recognized in the case of a catastrophe. How was the OKC attack able to be executed when those technologies were in place? What technologies available today, w ould have improved the chances of better protecting the assets? (150-200 words) Some technologies are currently accessible that, if they had been available back then, would have made the likelihood of more robust asset protection greater. It may be possible to build dwellings at a distance from roadways to reduce the risk that residents may be killed or injured by the fertilizer bomb truck. Terrorists would have fewer opportunities to carry out their attacks if the government devised a more advanced security strategy (Borum et al., 1999). To prevent the widespread injuries and fatalities caused by shattered glass during a bombing, the blast-resistant glass would be installed. Including a greater quantity of reinforced concrete in the building slabs would have prevented the floor from collapsing as a result of the explosion, hence reducing the number of people that were killed. If concrete jersey barriers and flower pots had been placed around the federal building before the explosion, it is feasible that the damage caused by the blast could have been reduced. Keeping public structures from looking like fortresses and, more importantly, from being so tall that they pose a greater risk of causing fatalities in a terrorist attack.  Regarding the environment that you have chosen in this course, apply the lessons of the OKC bombing by explaining how you can better protect the assets in your environment from various threats. (250-300 words) NOTE: This is the question that you will address in the Peer Review Forum. Although the Oklahoma City bombing tore the city apart by affecting many families, it also taught us some valuable lessons. The city's response to the incident set the standard for how the rest of the country dealt with similar situations in the future. Among the lessons, we took away from the tragedy was the importance of only advocating for issues that directly affect us (Wansley, 2016). Bombers' motivations stemmed from desperation and allowed them to rationalize their attacks. The Bank of Oklahoma had already been analyzing the attack to devise a disaster recovery plan before it happened, demonstrating the importance of forethought in such situations. Exiting to a federal building, for instance, was part of the original plan. A worker who had been counted as present but had disappeared was located safe and sound even though the procedure had been strictly adhered to. This should have served as a wake-up call for companies to start working on backup disaster recovery plans to protect their staff from harm.   References Borum, R., Fein, R., Vossekuil, B., & Berglund, J. (1999). Threat assessment: Defining an approach for evaluating risk of targeted violence. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 17(3), 323-337.  Ennis, L., Hargreaves, T., & Gulayets, M. (2015). The integrated threat and risk assessment centre: A program evaluation investigating the implementation of threat management recommendations. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 2(2), 114. Wansley, M. T. (2016). Regulation of Emerging Risks. Vand. L. Rev., 69, 401. Past Threat Analysis References Mokhatab, S., Mak, J. Y., Valappil, J., & Wood, D. (2013). Handbook of liquefied natural gas. Gulf Professional Publishing. Pacific Gas & Electric Pipeline Rupture in San Bruno, CA. PHMSA. (n.d.). Retrieved January 23, 2023, from https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/safety-awareness/pipeline/pacific-gas-electric-pipeline-rupture-san-bruno-ca PG&E resolves prosecution of Kincade Fire. District Attorney. (n.d.). Retrieved January 23, 2023, from https://da.sonomacounty.ca.gov/pgande-resolves-prosecution-of-kincade-fire Sengul, H., Santella, N., Steinberg, L. J., & Cruz, A. M. (2012). Analysis of hazardous material releases due to natural hazards in the United States. Disasters, 36(4), 723-743. Wansley, M. T. (2016). Regulation of Emerging Risks. Vand. L. Rev., 69, 401. Behavioral Analysis Student’s Name Institutional Affiliation Course Date Behavioral analysis is assessing the intrinsic behavioral patterns of individuals in different settings and under different influences as a function of their psychological occurrences. The assurance of people from counterfeit dangers requires the utilization of social examination to concentrate on the idea examples and psychology of crime and terrorists. An intricate method for connecting wrongdoing, fear, and mental improvement is to survey past wrongdoing and illegal intimidation cases and the culprits (Newsome & Jarmon, 2016). Such analysis considers the foundation of connections in the development and improvement, thought processes, and arranging of criminal and psychological militant goes after that guarantee blameless lives and harm others. The following paper will review two terrorists and one criminal from the psychological scope of behavioral analysis to identify the links between threats, aggression, and the psychological state of perpetrators. Examples of high-profile terrorists include Abubakar Shekau and Nasir al-Wuhayshi while an example of a criminal who was not a terrorist is Joseph Dewey Akin. Abubakar Shekau Head of Boko Haram, the Nigerian militants who kidnapped more than 300 students in April. Shekau, accepted to be in his late 30s, is said to seek to be the African canister Loaded. In a video in July, he delivered a video in which he taunted the Twitter campaign #BringBackOurGirls, on the side of the prisoners (Montclos, 2014). His manner of speaking has developed more enemy of America as of late. Terror experts are separated about whether he is mentally unstable. The State Division has a $7 million bounty on him. Nasir al-Wuhayshi Leader of al Qaeda in the Middle Eastern Peninsula and recognized by John Brennan, the CIA chief, recently as al Qaeda's number two. The post had been empty beginning around 2011 when an American robot took out the last man to hold it. Wuhayshi is accepted to be in his mid-40s and a possible replacement for the more established Zawahri. Wuhayshi won acclaim inside al Qaeda after he and 22 different hostages got away from a Yemeni jail in 2006. He was an individual right hand to receptacle Loaded before the Sept. 11 attacks (Karadeli, 2017). Joseph Dewey Akin Nurse Joseph Dewey Akin stands apart in light of the fact that in his work he should be saving lives, not taking them. Yet, that is the specialists accept he spent his profession doing: More than ten-year time frame while working at around 20 different medical care offices, Akin is thought to have ended the lives of 100 people, including a quadriplegic he confessed to killing with a deadly dose of lidocaine. Many terrorist groups conduct terrorist activities as a way to bring about social change. Typically, these gatherings address convictions, viewpoints, and positions on political and strict issues which are not acknowledged by the greater part. These terrorists are what a few social therapists characterize as " active minorities ". Spreading of dread or fear through brutality has an informative aspect. The connection between illegal intimidation and promulgation shows that all things considered, psychological militant viciousness is a way to guide individuals' focus toward specific issues and expose the terrorist's political or strict requests. Joining a terrorist association is the consequence of connecting and associations with individuals who embrace radical political or strict thoughts (Newsome & Jarmon, 2016). As per investigates, the demonstration of joining a jihadist association, for example, al-Qaeda originates from the singular making an unexpected kinship with extreme jihadists' individual perspectives. The psychosocial viewpoint likewise stressed the significance of "optional socialization" processes in which psychological oppressors become involved in the wake of joining an extreme association. It is important to note that many terrorist organizations could be firmly connected with patterns of political assembly and mass fights against states which happen every once in a while. Terrorist campaigns are the aftereffect of a long radicalization cycle of specific political or strict development. At the point when those developments lose their social impact, they will quite often separate and structure various gatherings. Commonly, psychological terrorist organizations introduce themselves as the safeguards of the qualities and interests of an ethnic or strict local area which cause them to accept that their position is right. The likelihood of the development of any friendly dissent development not just relies upon the potential open doors presented by the social circumstance, yet additionally the ability of the development to activate fundamental assets they required. The terrorist group will, in general, utilize the technique, of covertness, power, and terrorizing to get the assets they required. Terrorism would never be conceivable without the presence of a philosophy that gives significance and defense to individuals who plan, execute, and support their savage activities. Philosophy for this situation alludes to an arrangement of radical convictions and values that are shared by the terrorist association and its prospective partners (Ronningstam & Baskin-Sommers, 2022). This is significant because the more individuals who share a comparative perspective to the perspective of the psychological oppressors, the more prominent the potential for violence. The highlighted concept applies to the two high-profile terrorists since they are associated with the terrorist group Boko Haram and al Qaeda. The criminal that represents the greatest risk is Abubakar Shekau as a result of his psychological oppressor thought processes and the country's ongoing exercises. Abubakar will have an obvious objective in the nation since his casualties are students, a large portion of whom need weapons, like firearms, to safeguard themselves in a mass shooting. Besides, Abubakar’s status as a Nigerian resident permits him to get to the library and direct an earlier evaluation of the environs to design and coordinate his assault on library clients and staff precisely. Hence, Abubakar has the rationale, weaponry, access choices, and information on the area and targets' weaknesses that will expand the losses from an assault. The most effective way to safeguard the library is to guarantee that it counter-records all library clients' data with the FBI and security offices to track and capture expected psychological militants. The library can likewise set up physical and electronic devices to distinguish, caution, and block a potential assailant that looks to utilize the mass shooting to complete an assault. It can likewise introduce indestructible entryways and safe rooms inside the premises and increment debacle reaction coordination to control future dangers of a similar type. In conclusion, it is fundamental to evaluate the behavioral aspects of criminals and terrorists to identify normal examples of assaults and dangers. The mental improvement of individuals has a few obligations in crime and terrorism, and security specialists should survey such parameters in handling criminals and terrorists. References Karadeli, A. S. (2017). AN OLD THREAT LEFT IN THE SHADOWS OF ISIS–AL-QAEDA IN THE ARABIAN PENINSULA. Redefining Community in Intercultural Context, 6(1), 180-186. Montclos, M. A. P. (2014). Boko Haram and politics: From insurgency to terrorism. Islamism, politics, security and the state in Nigeria, 135. Newsome, B. O., & Jarmon, J. A. (2016). A practical introduction to homeland security and emergency management: From home to abroad. SAGE Publications. Ronningstam, E., & Baskin-Sommers, A. R. (2022). Fear and decision-making in narcissistic personality disorder—a link between psychoanalysis and neuroscience. Dialogues in clinical neuroscience.