If you are an attorney, is there a point where nonlegal moral considerations supersede your ethical commitment to your client?

1. If you are an attorney, is there a point where nonlegal moral considerations supersede your ethical commitment to your client? If you were a defense lawyer and your client was innocent, but you could not prove it, would you violate ethical barriers in service to your client? 2.Are the following actions of a prosecutor legal? Are they ethical? Explain your answers. a. Authorizing the arrest of one brother for drugs (knowing the young man would lose a scholarship to college), even though the prosecutor knows the charge would be thrown out, in order to have leverage so that he would give evidence against his brother. b. Announcing a suspect of a drive-by shooting to the media so that the offender is in danger from the rival gang members, and then offering protective custody only if the man will plead guilty. c. Authorizing the arrest of a ten-year-old boy who confessed to a crime, even though there was no serious possibility that he was guilty, in order to pressure a relative to confess. 3. Identify one type of judicial misconduct and provide a real life example of a judge participating in misconduct. 4. How would you rule? Assume you are a judge who must sentence the following people: a). A young woman who was forced into drug use and sales by her stepfather, who had been sexually abusing with her since she was eleven. b) A father who killed the man who molested his child. c) An honors college student who drank at a fraternity rush party, drove back to the dorm, and on the way, ran over a pedestrian will vary. d. A poor single mother who embezzled money from her employer to pay for her child's needed surgery because the employer did not provide health insurance. 5. Do you support capital punishment? Provide arguments supporting your view. Are your arguments utilitarian or from some other ethical system and if so which system?